logo


Just recently, I was forced to retire a pair of shoes that were my loyal and steadfast friends for the last three years.  These were formative times, my early twenties, and the shoes accompanied me through various stages and places in my wayward journeys.

We met at the Lady Footlocker on Broadway in New York.  It was the summer of 2007 and the cold air of the store provided a greatly needed respite from the sticky humidity of the outdoors, awash with throngs of tourists walking at a frustrating pace and the smell of honey roasted peanuts riding wafts of exhaust from yellow cabs.  Shopping malls have Cinnabon; New York has Nuts 4 Nuts.

They were low top, white shoe laced Converse: a treated leather that appeared gold to some people and silver to others.  I preferred to see them as silver, as gold seemed to me to be a little gauche for my liking.  I tried them on.  A size 9, even though I am technically a size 10.  The deflationary sizing made me feel better about myself and my giant feet, thus making me more likely to purchase these delightful shoes.  Success.

Whitney weighed in, saying that she liked them.  Her friend Paloma, who I did not yet know well enough to respect or reject her opinion, also said that she liked them.  A few more foot turns in the ground-floor mirror and I was off to the cash register to invest in the next three years of my life.

That summer those shoes went everywhere with me.  Bike rides over the bridge into Brooklyn, dance parties in bars that looked like the basements of shitty hunting cabins, more dance parties in lofts across from people I used to love.  These shoes were magical because their nondescript metallic shade went with everything and then again went with nothing.  It was the sartorial equivalent of beige.

Soon enough the summer expired and I moved back to Los Angeles to make money and live the easy life, adding cash to my bank account and voluntarily subtracting fun and adventure from my life.  The shoes came with me, crying about how I would never use them in a city where no one ever walked.  Sure, I would make a few random trips to San Francisco and work some good wear and tear into their soles, but by and large my Converse would regrettably morph into something akin to a 4×4 Range Rover in metropolis – marvelous in craftsmanship and styling, but starved of opportunities to live up to its capabilities.

To relieve my shoes from the humdrum malaise of Hollywood, I took them on a trip to Paris with me.  I wore them on the plane, next to a French man who tried to articulate in poor English that I would really love France.  It is possible he was flirting with me, but I was too busy staring out at the city awaiting me outside of my window to notice.

We went to the catacombs, Versailles, the d’Orsay.  The Louvre did not impress either of us.  Every day we would walk and walk and on the days in which I woke up late, which were many, my shoes were mad at me for wasting precious opportunities to see the sights.

Two years later, me and my shoes went to London.  They were very excited when I managed to swindle my way into a first class ticket.  It was an overnight flight and after eating my little pieces of parmesan cheese, my warm mixed nuts, the two glasses of syrupy white wine, I tucked my shoes away and propped my socked feet up on the bed that I would be sleeping on until we were on the other side of the world.

London was much more work than Paris was for the both of us.  We got lost often, wandering around in circles for hours and watching the clock arms swing around alarmingly fast while the tube took us from central London to the outskirts of Notting Hill.

The pavement there was gray and most often wet.  My shoes, looking more worse for the wear since their last time abroad, walked the streets beautifully.  Perfectly worn in to accompany my every strange bump and curve, splitting at the seams where my feet told them to.  These were my shoes.

This is why when I realized that it was time to put them down, I became very sad.  The most visceral and self-actualizing moments in my life thus far had taken place while wearing these shoes – these silly pieces of rubber and leather, of stitching and labels, my Made in China but Worn Everywhere shoes.  I had never been so attached to an inanimate object.  In fact, when I retired them I felt like I was euthanizing a childhood dog.

And like dogs, when I went to the Converse store to pick out the shoes that would presumably be with me for the next three years, I felt like I was betraying my old silver standbys.  I was still wearing them as I inspected the varying shades and different canvas offerings of the new styles.  When I put them on my feet, they fit strangely and too tight in the areas that my old shoes had graciously given up on.

I stood in the mirror, one foot on my future and the other on my past.  The future looked clean and bright, more up to date and fashionably relevant.  The past was grimy and busted, shoe laces now an embarrassing and soiled gray.  They had somehow managed to transform from a shoe into a testament of personal growth, of moving ahead, of my own little life.

That day I purchased two pairs: a high top black and white tweed and a low top gray canvas.  When I returned home I took off my old shoes, placed them on the tile of my mother’s foyer and stared at them for a moment.  They looked like hell.  They were precisely in the shape of my foot, which is not how a foot should be shaped.  Against the clean white surface of the floor, they looked like I had stolen them from a homeless person or a twelve-year-old boy who skateboarded after school instead of doing his homework.  I knew I should have thrown them away, that they were just shoes and nothing more than that, but when I opened the door to make my way to the trashcan I stopped myself.  I turned around and went back inside, into the bedroom that was mine during my teenage years, and placed my weathered old shoes in the closet, where they will sit until I realize that I am a silly person obsessed with nostalgia and the trappings of my own past.

Comments

Related Posts


The Shell of Things, by Jenny Bahn 05-08-2012
Annoying bits of pistachio shells fall onto my skirt, littering the surface of my black tights like snow. Doug, the show’s “producer,” stands to my left, eyeing me in watchful disdain. I can’t tell if he’s annoyed that I am eating or pissed that I’m making as a lap-bound mess while waiting to get my hair and makeup done. I sit there, pi...

Watching the River Flow, by Jenny Bahn 04-25-2012
The wind breathes mossy air over the East River, hot like breath. I keep waiting for spring to retract its premature promises.  I watch the canopy spread its arms above my street, filling the space between brick buildings and blue sky.  I wait for the leaves to curl back into their little pods like disturbed sea anemones, shrinking to the touch....

Insignificant Others: Hollywood, by Jenny Bahn 04-12-2012
FEEL MORE! Golden words commanded from their place on a clean windowpane. Words advertising clothing and midcentury furniture, a lifestyle this particular store wanted to promote. FEEL MORE! Lourdes wanted to feel less. She wanted to feel nothing. She was in a horrible mood, one that had become distressingly familiar. The strain in her che...

Sadist In The City, by Jenny Bahn 04-03-2012
“It smells…like…like flowers in here.” The four of us walk through a marble lobby, complete with doorman, $1,000 centerpiece, and an aroma I only ever associate with impossibly expensive hotel spas. Care for a cold towel, Miss Bahn? It’s literally the nicest smelling lobby I’ve ever walked into in New York – an incredible feat cons...

Continental Cockfosters, by Jenny Bahn 03-27-2012
With my trustworthy Xanax and a healthy serving of wine from a clear, plastic screw-top bottle, I fall asleep after dinner and wake up to breakfast – a shitty white roll that looks suspiciously similar to the shitty croissant they serve on the flight to Paris.  My itinerary calls the Spartan slop placed before me “continental,” which at one ...

  1. pshirley
    News flash to me: There's a Converse store?!
  2. Randi
    I love your writing style. You have an amazing way with words.
  3. jb
    Paul, there is a giant outlet store out by Palm Springs. Randi, I appreciate the comment. - Jenny
  4. Fazerski
    This is self-indulgent writing at its worst - why do you think anyone, outside of yourself, would want to read this? You don't use the shoes as any sort of coherent narrative, or even interesting story. Do you ever notice how the only people that ever comment here are the other "writers", or, occasionally, family members of the writers?
  5. corey
    Fazerski, I think South Park got it wrong when they named John Edward "the biggest douche in the universe". That award obviously goes to you.
  6. Randi
    Fazerski- I'm waiting for your comments on my previous pieces. I don't think you've been mean enough to me yet.
  7. Fazerski
    Randi, Honestly, I gave up after the "Brains v. Beauty" article. Let me guess - the primary subtext is some deep feminine insecurity that scares you, you make yourself feel better by "pulling one over" or generally proving your superiority to another woman in the story that embodies whatever aspect about yourself you think is lacking. And it's extremely poorly structured. Feel better?
  8. jenny b
    Dear Fazerski, My writing is intended to connect with other people on a communal level, subconciously or otherwise. It is my intention to remind people of their own past, etc, not utilize writing as a tool for intellectual masturbation. Do you read books? Like at all? Or memoirs of any sort? Ever give David Sedaris a go? Augusten Buroughs? I think if you did you might not have such a negative reaction to my work. With that said, I'm sorry I don't get you off, as it were. Cheers, and keep reading.
  9. Randi
    Yes, thank you.
  10. corey
    FACE
  11. Fazerski
    Jenny B., I've read "Me Talk Pretty One Day" by David Sedaris (as well as his periodical writing), and "Dry" and "Possible Side Effects" by Augusten Borroughs. I hate to be the one to break this to you, but you're no Sedaris or Borroughs. I think raising them in your defense highlights one of the central problems with your writing - you think, after reading either of them, that, "hey, all they did was write about their lives! I can do that!" However, that's ignoring the unquestionable level of craftsmanship that goes into their stories - the endless hours they've spent writing, re-writing, and editing their stories. At their core, both are excellent storytellers who are good at the basics - they have some kind of exposition, some sort of critical turning point, then some sort of resolution. Basically, they something look easy that is definitely not easy - as your stories prove.
  12. jenny b
    I am not attempting to compare myself to either author. As I am nearly half their respective ages I do not yet possess the life experiences that they are able to weave into their own stories, creating an elaborate fabric of complexity. What I am doing, at this point, are essentially writing exercises. I don't know what you're expecting to get here but maybe you should look into reading things you actually enjoy and stop being a glutton of punishment.
  13. jenny b
    I am not attempting to compare myself to either author. As I am nearly half their respective ages I do not yet possess the life experiences that they are able to weave into their own stories, creating an elaborate fabric of complexity. What I am doing, at this point, are essentially writing exercises. I don't know what you're expecting to get here but maybe you should look into reading things you actually enjoy and stop being a glutton for punishment.
  14. Fazerski
    "As I am nearly half their respective ages I do not yet possess the life experiences that they are able to weave into their own stories, creating an elaborate fabric of complexity." I don't think it necessarily has to do with uniqueness of experience - I think either of those writers could take a mundane experience common to all of us and write an engaging story about it. My point is that is has to do with their technique and ability to manipulate dramatic structure - which you'd have to be able to do to make a story about throwing away your favorite pair of shoes interesting to anyone outside of yourself. You're probably right, though. I should tone it down a little. I'm done until next week. Auf wiedersehen!
  15. play nice Fazerski or don't play at all
    it appears very easy to criticize from the qwerty pulpit you've built yourself behind your computer wherever you are writing from without ever having to prove that you are in any way qualified to bestow judgment upon these writers or their short stories. from your advantageous position of anonymity you're seemingly free to philander endlessly with your own deprecating devices. as you've demonstrated above and in the other criticisms i've seen you post, you're removed position yet consistent direct engagement is tantamount to being a kid in a candy store, or in your case, more likely a man in a candy store full of little kids. please do not misconstrue my words if you're in fact still following me, in no way am i implying that the writing of these authors is in any way juvenile, in most cases, especially with Jenny's work above, the writing is extremely well crafted and far superior to the vast majority of comparable writings out there. to be more clear, i'm saying, you touch little kids George Harvey. your obvious inexperience in the art of a constructive literary critique coupled with your peremptory yet underwhelming judgment of these individuals' life experiences comes across as opprobrious at best. Your decision to not have included a link to what we are left to hypothesize is your vastly superior writing leaves me with the wonder and opportunity to fantasize about the literary masterpieces that you must create in your home but are unwilling to share with the world. it is an overused yet undervalued expression to say that those who can't do, teach; or end up taking a job teaching. however, given the frequent postings you have graciously shared with us above and the fact that you've fortuitously neglected to include your resume or any semblance of evidence that you are in fact working right now, on a work day of all things, merits the argument that you do not have a job, and in fact have nothing better to do with your time. as a piece of constructive criticism from myself to you, it is my opinion that you may in fact benefit more from your literary postings in the form of a resume on monster.com and it's peers/competitors, than on this website. everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and most authors write with the knowledge and expectation of receiving both positive and negative reviews of their work. I personally read over 600,000 pages last year. i'm unfortunately able to boast about that feat due to my profession within the literary industry. and i can guarantee you that Jenny's short story above falls into the top 1% of everything I've had the privilege, as well as displeasure of reading. the difference between myself, and you, and individuals like Michiko Kakutani, Janet Maslin, or Dwight Garner (who ARE considered experts of literary critique) is that I am not paid to express my opinions, nor am i paid to blog or write about them. i merely pass on manuscript X or reject screenplay Y because they are just not good enough. that is what i am paid to do. yet even with a pass or rejection letter i offer constructive criticism to each author as to how their work can become the next Sedaris or Borroughs. i find it much more preferable and rewarding to build others up and help them grow than the pusillanimous route you have taken. Because what you've graced us with above is self-indulgent writing at its worst, and why do you think anyone, outside of yourself, would want to read this? PS - please spare me the retort as to who has the bigger kindle or the bigger dick, because i can guarantee you i have you beat in both.
  16. jenny b
    Yeah, really. I'm super fortunate to count you as a loyal reader. I will make sure to produce the worst shit imaginable so that you have something to do with your day.
  17. A person
    Hey Fazerski - If this is self-indulgent writing, then so is your comment. Your critique is pedestrian; not to mention your opinion on narrative is base and unsupported. Instead of attacking someone's work with simple-minded arguments, and before you start undermining someone's hobby with air-quotes, come at us with your own work first. Go write something. Or at least come back with an elevated revision or elaboration of your initial thought.
  18. M Shaffer
    Jenny B, great stuff. While reading it, I was actually marveling at how well you took something as boring as shoes and made me want to keep reading. I also liked the "There's-always-a-bigger-fish" parable we all got taught in this comment thread. p.s. Size 10? I believe they call those "gun boats." :)
  19. Conor
    Just as an aside to something I read early on in this comments blitz. I've read everything on this site since day one, usually within a day or two of it's posting. I don't choose to comment. I enjoy reading almost all of the pieces (theres a snoozer or boring topic mixed in with the gold), but afterwards I don't feel the need to say anything. Just to do it now because people think a lack of comments means a lack of readers..... I read everything, but never comment, so just assume there is always one more reader than you think. And since I don't comment at all... Tara is what we might call in New England, wicked hot.
  20. Jared
    i can certainly relate, hence the little league baseball glove that i refuse to throw away. good work. on a side note, it seems that most of the writers on this site are using the articles as 'essentially writing exercises'. Do you all want our negative feedback? I know there have been columns on here that i did not find well written or enjoyable, but i didn't know how to express that without sounding like a dick. Suggestions?
  21. Randi
    Jared- I'm so glad you asked that question. Oddly, I'm working on a piece about the helpfulness of all criticism (especially negative criticism. Many people hold back the dirty truth for fear of hurting feelings, but I'm of the opinion that honest criticism is the only way for an artist to see his or her work from all perspectives). That being said, and I can't speak for everyone on the site, but I would love to hear all opinions...good and bad.
  22. Fazerski
    "Your decision to not have included a link to what we are left to hypothesize is your vastly superior writing leaves me with the wonder and opportunity to fantasize about the literary masterpieces that you must create in your home but are unwilling to share with the world." Your idiotic post is emblematic of everything wrong with the "literary industry" - an industry that I am in no way, shape, or form a part of. I don't have the vaguest connection with the "literary industry", or professional (or amateur, for that matter) writing in any way. There is no great unfinished masterpiece at home. No frustrated potential. Instead, I'm simply a consumer. I like to read, not write. I'm the audience, the person on the other end that the writer is supposed to connect to. Do I need a degree in film to know that the movie "Couples Retreat" is horrible? Do I really need to have directed multiple movies myself to realize that "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" is unwatchable? Do you seriously assert that I need have attended Le Cordon Bleu, and, you add, actually have attempted to run a restaurant myself, to know that what I'm eating is actually runny shit? No. However, you'd have us believe that only those is the insular "literary industry" of which you boast of being a member, have any ability to say "Hey, wait, I'm eating shit." Your isolated penninsula of "art", however, isn't helping you - the fact that you flout your supposed credentials in the "literary industry" to lend credence to your views only serves to highlight that you're using those credentials to paper over your fundamental shortcomings. In short, your credentials can't dress a naked emperor. An idiot in the "literary industry" is still an idiot. "Jenny’s short story above falls into the top 1% of everything I’ve had the privilege, as well as displeasure of reading." What a depressing statement about the "literary industry". Enjoy your shit. "PS – please spare me the retort as to who has the bigger kindle or the bigger dick, because i can guarantee you i have you beat in both." I don't have a kindle, nor a dick. Which one are you trying to make up for?
  23. slavin
    oh shut up, all of you.
  24. Anonymous
    Hello, I'm also a consumer, I read the whole thing and felt entertained. I'm new to the site, having found it when Shirley offended greater North America. I'll be back. Note to this Fazerski blowhard... It's nice that you are able to destroy a young writer's efforts with nothing at risk yourself. Do you have any basis or credentials of you own, supporting your castration of this piece? ...I mean other than your self-important, contrite, pretentious claim as a 'consumer'? I'm a consumer, too and you're ruining my buzz. Fall in a well.
  25. Scott
    I'm a consumer, too. I felt entertained. Fazerski, nobody gives a shit what you think. If you want to destroy young writers' dreams, check into teaching Comp & Rhetoric at the local JC, or you could simply fall in a well.

Leave a Reply

captcha *