logo


In writing a column about the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake, it was not my intent to suggest that I don’t care about the fate of Haiti, or that I am not sympathetic to the people who make up the huge numbers and heartbreaking images we see flashed across our television and computer screens.

Instead, my goal was to question the psychology of donating, the way we react to natural disasters and the nature of responsibility leading up to and immediately after those disasters.  Regardless of the outcry that followed, I think I did those things.

When I wrote about the responsibility borne by the Haitian people for their circumstances prior to the earthquake, I did not make clear that I understand that outside influences have played a large part in determining those circumstances.  However, I maintain that much of the responsibility (not all) for one’s fate – or for the fate of a group of people – lies with that person or with those people.  I understand that dire circumstances can make taking the yoke of that responsibility very, very difficult.  But to assume that the Haitians’ fate was not at least in part their own responsibility is to insult that group of people even more.  It rationalizes much of the United States’ past meddling in the affairs of Haiti.  But most of all, it shows even less respect to the Haitian people.

I’m disappointed that some outlets chose to extract segments of my column, framing my opinions in their own.  Many readers were going to disagree with my opinions regardless of the context in which they were presented – that was, in some ways, the point of writing them.  But when they were enticed into reading the piece by potentially inflammatory bits that were taken out of context, readers had little chance to look at my views with the proverbial clean slate.

While I will not apologize for writing my column, I do accept the repercussions associated with writing it and hope that some good may come out of those repercussions: that people will stop and think about their own motivations for giving and that someone else might be inspired to come up with a better way to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters like the one in Haiti.

Thanks for reading.

Paul

Comments

Related Posts


High-Pressure Spanish, by Paul Shirley 05-16-2012
I recently spent two weeks in Spain promoting the translation of my book, Can I Keep My Jersey? (Me Puedo Quedar La Camiseta?,  thanks for asking.) On the trip, I shook hands, I signed copies of the book and I did interviews for newspapers and radio stations. I did all of those things, mostly, in Spanish. I speak Spanish with the same level ...

Text Message Limbo, by Paul Shirley 04-16-2012
It used to be simple. You got the girl’s number, you called her, you hoped you’d get her voicemail, you waited for her to call back, you made a plan to get Italian. But now? Now, nobody uses the telephone for the “phone” part. So, unless the girl is not a girl at all – i.e. over 40 – you’re going to need to send a text message. ...

There's No Need To Shout: On Trayvon Martin & Racism, by Paul Shirley 04-03-2012
You are probably aware that there used to be a 17-year-old in Florida named Trayvon Martin and that there is no longer a 17-year-old in Florida named Trayvon Martin. You are probably also aware that many people – athletes and celebrities and politicians alike – have come out in condemnation of the circumstances surrounding Trayvon Martin’s...

The Madness, by Paul Shirley 03-29-2012
When I was 18, I left my tiny Kansas hometown to play basketball at Iowa State University. During my college career, I cared so much about basketball that I was willing to put up with screaming coaches, early-morning practices, and the complete absence of any social life. I worried more than most CEOs. I slept less than most workaholics. To combat ...

Faith?, by Paul Shirley 03-27-2012
Imagine this scenario, if you will: I’m standing in a room. I don’t know how I got into this room. There is another man in this room with me. The man tells me that if I stay in this room with him for the next 24 hours, if I follow his orders, if I put my absolute trust in his guidance, and if I tell him I like his haircut once every...

  1. pragmatism
    i'm not saying that paul is a racist. i'm just saying that he is a failed basketball player and failing writer who is lashing out at anyone else of color when opportune. its tough that they were better than him. for example, he said: "I have dealt with the issues of race in athletics all of my life. It is very difficult to make it in the world of basketball as a white person." and "I'm no great spokesman for race relations; many of the black men around whom I've spent time shared a seething dislike for me that had me checking my pockets to make sure I hadn't stolen something from them." because the big black men were better than him, he can only understand other people's suffering through his own experience. consider: "As I've finished this column, it has occurred to me that this will be posted the day after Martin Luther King Jr. Day. I hate Martin Luther King Jr. Day. I think it's a divisive holiday. Instead of celebrating an intelligent man who happened to be black, there are those (and they are many) who would have us celebrate MLK because he's a black man who happened to be intelligent." or maybe this was considwered funny to him. his white friends laughed, why won't the rest of the world?: "As such, by the time my family had finished tiding its collective yule, my cache of music was as depleted as a UN rice truck after six hours in a Sudanese refugee camp." so in conclusion, i am not calling him a racist at all. i just think that his parents had a responsibility to ensure that he turned into a human being but failed miserably.
  2. Lexus
    Hmm, this all deals with quite a bit of what ifs. What if we do this, what if they had done so, then all would have been better. Fact remains we got a country that is devastated by a earthquake with several hundred thousand dead, a lot more wounded and homeless. Are we going to sit back and say 'to bad for you all, but if you had been richer you wouldnt be in this mess. Now, good luck with rebuilding your country'
  3. LordPhobos
    Paul your the man.. F all these left wing savages who think throwing money at clowns is going to help anything... I bet my life that in 12 months all is forgot.. and ALL the money and supplies have been stolen and traded for trinkets umong the gangsters Now running Haiti... You think the taliban is corupt.. you should see the savages in Haiti. Also, kalifani6 is a retard.... ANY HUMAN who decides to be a SAVAGE makes a personal choice.. Poverty, is NOT an excuse to be an animal.
  4. Pat Robertson
    Paul: Call Me! 700 Club
  5. C. Mosby
    Have posted this twice previously, only to have it disappear after your “moderation”. What’s the problem with this comment and question? Would appreciate an answer to my question. Mr. Shirley: This drivel is just further evidence of your propensity to whine and complain and ultimately hold yourself unaccountable for your failures. Your propensity to do that was made eminently visible by those who read and reviewed your book about the time you spent in the NBA. Link here: http://www.amazon.com/Can-Keep-Jersey-Countries-Basketball/product-reviews/0345495705/ref=sr_1_1_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1 The overwhelming consensus from those reviews is that you are a whining complainer who seems to be undeservedly impressed with your own intelligence and opinion. That consensus is further borne out by a line in this latest attempt to deny responsibility and justify your views. It’s when you say this about the Haitian conditions: “I did not make clear that I understand that outside influences have played a large part in determining those circumstances.” Any objective reading of what you originally wrote would reveal that it was not a matter of “not making clear” that you understand this vital component of the circumstances in Haiti. Rather, any such reading would show that you failed to make any mention of the role of “outside influences”. Even for a man of your writing skills, it would be difficult to “make clear” an understanding that is never, in fact, detailed. If you do understand the role of “outside influences”, why do you now choose to further defend what you wrote instead of discussing that understanding in this piece? In case you were just “blowing smoke”, here’s your chance to gain some real perspective: http://www.nationnews.com/story/guest-column-hilary-beckles-copy-for-web You’re a young man with some obvious talent. Try opening your mind and growing a little.
  6. Jon
    Thanks for the history lesson, Kalifan6. Those are bitter truths. But if France is to pay reparations to Haiti imagine the debt incurred by the United States not only to Haiti, but also the Philippines, Chile, Iran, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. We'd be the same slave state that Haiti was to the French. But I agree that they should get billions in reparations from both France and the United States.
  7. Jean-Paul Lizotte
    Wow. I am astonished. I suppose that an Einsteinian maxim would be appropriate about now. Everything is realtive people! Being in a privilidged position often has an adverse effect when dispensing criticism, sarcasm and irony. But often even an opinion will be judged harshly. Note that the irony of people calling the original author (Paul Shirley) names and being judgemental really drives it home. People telling him that he threw the first stone, then proceed to pick up their own. It is as if we will only accept criticism from people that make us feel guilty. We all have something to feel guilty about and personally my guilt is not for sale today. And this goes to really basic psychological question: Is any altruism real. Or do we always do things to satisfy our own agendas or to be rid of guilt. And since we are all different people we all deal differently with our feelings, there is no factual or basolute answer. So we have to live with a "vive la différence" attitude, if we are to get along, at all. I have discussed the issue at lenght with several people and the four basic themes that occur time and time again are these: Guilt, Sympathy, Greed and Pride. We are quick to forget that it matters not what the problem is and who we are, we are all humans. As complicated as we like to make things, it usually boils down to something much much simpler. We all feel these same 4 things, but the varying degrees (among other things) is enough to make us different. But I believe the wisest opinion I got so far was from a concerned parent: if we set all cultural background aside, I mean origin, race and history and we were to consider someone as our own (a sibling, or even a child) how far would we go supporting them until we notice that the support is not what is needed. As a metaphor, think of a brother that is battling a personal problem. Just throwing money at him probably won't help much. I think this was the crux. "Probably." But what if it does? What if he just snaps out of it once he has the finances? Doesn't that phrase just sound odd? We may hope this would work but if history teaches anything, money is not a cure all. For sure if he needs urgent aid, money may just be what he needs. But in the long run it seriously depends on what and where the money is spent in order for it to be productive. i.e.:My brother wouldn't be in this situation in the first place if he was apt to help himself though. So how does this play out now? Greed Putting money in the hands of a government that is already power hungry, will just strenghten their grip by building a better army to keep the people oppressed. And in this sense the people in Haiti are no different than many people across the world. They would surely like to live better but they have several obstacles in the way, money is actually funding it so it get's worse. The flipside of this is people that can never have enough, probably wouldn't give under any circumstances whatever it was. So no point in counting on them or badgering them, time is a wasting. Sympathy. Sure right now, the rest of the world are trying to feed clothe and help the immediate need. But all that effort will be vain if we don't do the responsible thing. If I translate this in my own terms, if my brother drinks and it's a problem and I am dedicated to help. Next time he picks up a bottle I'll slap it out of his hand or at least make sure he doesn't buy iit with my money. I'd go out and buy what I judge is needed (food, clothees, pay the rent) but never give cash that can be misused. In Haiti's case we can't buy them a new (better) government but we can send goods and services. The only two that come to mind are: education and building materials at this point. I mean how about the means to build basic but sturdy homes and then the education to allow people to make better decisions, build their own fate. Once the rescue effort is done, what we just take off and say good luck next time? Pride. At some point when someone is in trouble, the pride has to bite the bullet temporarily, admit their flaws and vow to do better. And of course do better. This in time will restore the pride. I do not believe in people that cannot change their fate around, given the proper tools unless they are afflicted with an endemic pathology. And no one will disagree that Haitians are not endemically doomed more than any other people. They have to define their own needs and see how they can come to purvey it. But before we get there there's a slow and painful road where they have to discover the areas where they need to work on themselves. Guilt. For us "weatlthy westerners" it is a card that is played on us every day. So much so it has made us a bit callous. And in effect caused a lot of harm in situations where we could do so much good. I am a "country boy" so to speak and in some of my first adventures in the big city (I live in the burbs now) I rapidly discovered how manipulative people would be to get charity, where in fact it was undue. Punks buying tatoos and drugs with money given for rent. A bum calling you names because you give him food instead of money and so on. This does not bode well the the charitable heart. Guilt is often used to make us act without thinking. And now that I have become a bit more callous, I have to think before I give and almost never give cash. Especially not to a 3rd party. So I do understand the so called bleeding hearts or liberals, but at the same time I can identify with Mr. Shirley's article: If we need to give we need to give right. Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish... well okay a cliché. But appropriate I think. However the point that seems to be missed is the "IF" in the IF we need to give. No one here can say if we do or not. To coerce help it is *taking*. Whether you use guilt, sophistry or pedantic rhetoric, I don't care. And by definition when we say "we need" it's from within not from without. Reflect on that before you get all high and mighty. On a personal Note: And when I tried to donate clothing and food last week I was rebuffed. Cash or checks only.
  8. adelsig
    hey! there's a dead horse!! let's beat it some more!
  9. First-time reader
    Paul, your frenzy-causing article about the people of Haiti is the first article of yours that I have ever read. It was referred to me by a friend of mine who is a loyal reader of yours. As an aspiring journalist, your column truly emphasizes the essence of journalism by bringing to life the very purpose that the career is supposed to serve: causing people to think. Any other piece would have been the standard cookie-cutter fact spitting, pity provoking, useless and cut-and-dry garbage that seem to inundate the media. It saddens me the negative repercussions you've had to face for stepping outside the box and challenging the status quo. Your column is uplifting and inspiring to the few of us who have not lost sight of what journalism and media are all about. You are a true writer and a true columnist, and whether people agree with your views or not doesn't matter. I don't even 100% agree with all of the things you mentioned, but I respect your courage to even mention them, and you've caused me to step back and take a look at my motivations in an entirely different light with a new perspective, and that's exactly what writers are supposed to do. Please don't stop writing, Paul. You've got the courage, sass, and sharp tongue that most writers would kill for. Besides, you know the only reason everyone's up your @$$ about this is because, well, you're probably right. People don't like to hear the truth if it's not the truth they wanna hear. But that's not your problem, so keep doin' your thing. You've made a fan out of me, buddy.
  10. Nice attempt
    You picked a horrible way to express a legitimate thought. You don't mock a nation that has lost 100,000 lives by saying "As we prepare to assist you in this difficult time, a polite request: If it’s possible, could you not re-build your island home in the image of its predecessor? Could you not resort to the creation of flimsy shanty- and shack-towns? And could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while? Sincerely, The Rest of the World"
  11. Dean
    Thank you. Finally someone who doesn't give into the pressures of the machine and is willing to stand behind what they say and believe (with legitimate facts and reason nonetheless) despite the clear repercussions. That said, with his talent I have no doubt Paul will land on his feet just fine.
  12. KF
    Well, congrats to Paul for making Sports Illustrated. They ran a story on ESPN firing him. Seems the man will probably have to go out now and work for a living.
  13. Kyle
    Paul, I am in complete support of your opinion and your letter. While I agree it may have been a little harsh, it's the absolute truth. If you give a man a fish he will eat for one day, if you teach a man to fish, he will eat for a lifetime. We as a people can't just continue to throw money at problems and hope they go away, otherwise, 20,30,40, 100 years from now, they next 7.2 magnitude earthquake hits, and history repeats itself. To all the naysayers vehemently attacking Pauls personal opinion, shame on you. Name calling went out of vogue in the third grade, and you are showing that you as sophisticated as a third grader, which is why you have no understanding of what Mr. Shirley is trying to say here. Paul is not the only one with this opinion, as a matter of fact, the editorial in I believe Newsweek last week was directly in line with what this letter said. Keep fighting the good fight, stand up for what you believe
  14. Jean-Paul Lizotte
    Too bad my comment was moderated out. I though it was rater legitimate and rather middle of the raod.
  15. Jean-Paul Lizotte
    Sorry, my bad, webbrowser cache not refreshed.
  16. PH
    I don't see how this letter addresses the primary complaint people seemed to have about your first article: it's disrespectful tone towards people still pulling the bodies of their children out of rubble.
  17. jimmy c
    Right on Paul. Typical 3rd world catholic country with no concept of birth control. Maybe God did them a favor. Wars take out the males whereas natural disasters take out the breeding females also, think about it.
  18. Carlyn Jones
    Paul, compassion. That's the first step in caring for others and a start for rebuilding. That's the best way to make a start.
  19. bolletrie
    All I saw in that previous blogpost was just some rightwing/conservative/republican rethoric about how poor people always have nobody to blame but themselves for the situation they are in. All it was was an insult to people who have been trying to overcome being raped by both the US and France repeatedly over the past 300 years. All it was, was a basketball player at the end of a so called career, trying to create some buzz for a new career at the expense of some people in the caribbean he had never heard of before last month. All it was, was an ignorant idiot with a keyboard and internet access. That is all it was my friend. Nothing thought provoking about it. If it was, you would have covered the most important aspects of the Haitian situation(namely its history)and then given your view. If it was supposed to be about the psychology behind donating, you would have focused on that instead of focusing on insulting Haitians. What happened in Haiti was a tragedy. We as humans have this little thing called empathy. When things like this occur it is our instinct to help out. Could the damage have been restricted? Maybe. How prepared can you be for something that happens once every 100 years? How prepared was the US on 9/11? Was the situation less tragic because the US could have prevented it?? A tragedy is a tragedy is a tragedy. We felt the pain for the 9/11 victims. We are feeling the pain for the people of Haiti. That is why we donate. We don't insult them because they're poor. We help out. We're human.
  20. Pat
    Nature manages over breeding of animals with starvation, disease, earthquakes, hurricanes and other disasters. It is the reality of life on this planet. How sad is it that humans have been here for millions of years and they still haven't learned this basic truth. By controlling the number of people you decrease suffering and improve the quality of life. If humans want a better life they need to make better choices starting with birth control.
  21. horizon
    You are one of kind if your Mother ask for help are you going to help or
  22. Educated
    You speak the words of an intellectual and use your brain as a brain should function (some don’t use their brains). Many are too blind to see and fully comprehend your view. Many are bias from the start of reading your article. Many are, will, and did interpret your stand as a man that is the world’s new villain. Those are the people who are blind sighted to see the truth. I am not saying those “many” are dumbfounded, but I am saying that they are blind to not see the logic.
  23. Reply from Canada
    It's fine to express your opinion. It's fine to be outside of the box. It's even fine to stir the sh*t. But signing "The rest of the world", while in reality it is only Paul - is NOT fine. You chose a strategic time to post your opinion, but did you think how much it will hurt, especially now that that lost even the little they had? Yes, their government is corrupted, yes the money isn't getting where it should, yes, donating all the time might lead to people not looking for other solutions and not even looking at the underlying problems. But the issue is - the comment was written in a derogatory, demeaning way. It did not sound like this "reaction" comment. It sounded more like frustrations of someone who has lived through reverse discrimination and who wants to be heard. At all costs. We are human and we need to help those worse off. We also need to make sure the help gets there. We also need to make sure the help teaches them how to do it on their own afterward, so they do not require constant help. So now that you said that you don't believe in donating and despise the way they deal with things, why don't you tell us what would you do? How would you remedy the situation, since you are so smart?
  24. APS
    Paul: I was a reader of your ESPN columns during your playing days, and I liked them. I think it's unfortunate for journalists now to cherry-pick quotes from your experience-based and fairly-well-reasoned articles to make you seem like a racist. That said, I need to comment on your Haiti piece. Simple fact: No one *chooses* to live in a shanty. Haiti would love to rebuild luxury condos for everyone, but that takes money. Criticizing people for living in shanties is like criticizing someone for a birthmark on their face.
  25. Scott
    Well said, APS. I too, was a fan of Paul Shirley's insightful blogs about his NBA and overseas playing days. The guy isn't dumb; all those people casually writing him off as a "stupid jock" have obviously not read his body of work. The man is (was?) very good at entertaining his readers, and showing them aspects of his profession that they hadn't seen before. Too bad his Haiti commentary was completely off the mark. As Paul belatedly (semi-)admitted himself, he failed to frame the current tragedy in the context of history. Sure, history is never solely to blame, but c'mon. His blog came off as ill-informed, overly simplistic, and just plain mean. And even when you do have some interesting things to say and some tough questions to ask, mean-spiritedness will cloud the dialogue every time. I hope Mr. Shirley can learn from this debacle, and perhaps return to his previous standing as "an athlete with a brain, with some interesting things to say." Interesting and thought-provoking, not mean-spirited and facile. I wish him luck.
  26. Michael
    So lets say you have a budget of $100 for all your personal needs. Let's say this $100 is plenty to live on, but if you don't budget properly you will run out of necessary resources, and you will eventually cease to exist. One day you go shopping for a set of new tires. The guy at Goodyear shows you a a pair for $100 and guarentees your safety on the road at all times. He also shows you a pair for less that just happens to fit nicely into your survival budget. They are not quite as safe, but fine just the less. You make the economical choice (one that depends on your survival)and buy the cheaper tires. One rainy day your tires fail under the circumstances and you crash your car and are left trapped on the side of the road. In Paul Shirley's world we are just supposed to drive on by and remind that poor chap by shouting smugly out the window "should have bought the other tires!!!!!" Paul - in layman's terms, you are a jackass!!!!! What a secure feeling it must be having you as a friend.
  27. Raf
    This is the best article on Haiti disaster relief (and beyond) I've read in terms of its objectivity. I completely agree with you Paul: " it is not outside the realm of imagination to think that the citizens of a country might be able to: A) avoid putting themselves into a situation that might result in such catastrophic loss of life. And B) provide for their own aid, in the event of such a catastrophe." On top of all this, a lot of the money that we'd put in as Westerners would go towards a "colonizing" type relief plan. Many relief workers/ donators might have the spread of religion in mind, the spread of a certain political agenda or way of thought...maybe individualistic fame... I still think that it was good what many others have done for Haiti. As we progress as a species, I hope that we do begin to work together, rather than become a group of individual nations fighting or looking down on one another. I praise those with the true nature of helping others without an outside agenda. May those that helped get rewarded with seeing Haiti re-build itself into a safe and sustainable nation, and be proud of themselves for being part of it. But like your article mentioned, we're not going to get there by being naive and opening our pockets without critical thought. Don't worry about ESPN, that shit was getting old anyways. Keep writing.
  28. scotty allen
    Ever life in a shack? If you did, you would know that you did so because you had to. Rebuild Haiti in what way? The Grand Victorian Manor? Teach a man to fish? Of course. But after sending him the fish that saves his/her life, then send a boat that he may fish from, and a house that his wife and children may build with their hands, while his hand is on his nets. Sick and tired of hearing "get real". Those who repeat this haven't a clue.
  29. American
    Hey Scotty Allen, send me a fish and a boat and build me a house and teach me to fish too! Since you seem to have more than enough. I didn't earn it or anything, but I'm entitled to it as a fellow human being. You'd do that for me right?
  30. Albert Shin
    You are a true douche. You don't hide it though so kudos to you for that.
  31. Jyrkface
    Anyone who's saying that this article is objective or qualifying it as journalism is an idiot. In order for something to be journalistically objective it must be sourced, preferably from more than three sources on both sides of the issue. It should also preferably stick to AP guidelines on objective language, which this does not. This is simple editorializing and can be debunked with briefest perusal of the facts. Paul Shirley is not a journalist, he's a failed athlete looking for a way to survive without working. Congratulations, you've found it for him.
  32. Natalie
    It is okay to express your opinion, get your point of view across- but the way you express those views are equally as important. You blame others for not seeing your views, for taking bits and pieces- try not to wrap them in controversial words and maybe we can debate your view instead of your choice of words.
  33. James
    I thought it was funny. I doubt many Haitians read it and were offended. I'm firing ESPN. I will no longer read their box scores. Let's jail-break Bill Simmons so we can enjoy some politically incorrect writing that hasn't been sanitized by corporate zombies... Bill never gets to finish his really interesting thoughts... and apparently Paul won't either.
  34. Nora Berry
    I would just like to say that I stumbled across this article and I support everything Paul Shirley has said about this topic. I've done a lot of research on Haiti (Saint-Domingue), from genealogical 17th century to the present day 'situation.' I think it is shameful what Haitians are doing to each other. As good-willed as donations are, they simply enable Haitians to continue on the path of self-destruction. When will Haiti ever pick itself up from the muck it has found itself in and become more than a plagued nation? I'm all for donating your shoes and clothes for those in need but just know, any money donated will most likely find itself in the pockets of the corrupt individuals who are driving Haiti through the path to hell. Not really sure how an opinion like this can be misunderstood.
  35. Jake
    Can we just call the blog post (stop calling it an article or a column because it was not) what it was: a cheap and self serving publicity stunt for this shitty blog. Having horrible taste in music and being incessantly sarcastic does not mean you're edgy. It means you're EXACTLY like every other failing writer desperate to get attention to his work.

Leave a Reply

captcha *